Archive for category Higher Education

To Phil Collins’ mum: Thank you for letting him drum

Hi, I’m Jose and I’m an entrepreneur. Starting and growing companies is my life. But in retrospect I know that it’s a path I unfortunately didn’t discover as soon as I should have.

All the telltale signs were there. Growing up as an immigrant, I had two parents who started their own businesses to support their new American lifestyle. When I wasn’t scheduling appointments or keeping the books in my mom’s beauty salon, I was watching my dad negotiate deals with his auto parts customers.

Phil Collins, professional drummer

Phil Collins, professional drummer

Raised by small business owners, you would think it would have been an obvious path. But I didn’t know it at the time – and no one helped me see it.

Instead, I did what I was expected to do, went to college, got a communications degree and ended up working in one of the most elite blocks of midtown Manhattan. I had all the trappings of success, but I’ll be honest. I was paid poorly and was miserable with the work I was doing.

It wasn’t long before I figured out that working for a large firm was not my calling, but I can’t help thinking that had I listened to the other voice on my shoulder, I might have gotten an earlier start. I mean, *I* might have invented Facebook!

STEM vs. STEAM — The “A” is the Game Changer

Everyone these days is into STEM – tech is going to save the world; engineers have it made; math and science isn’t just for boys, all that. It’s all true. What I think sometimes gets less attention is STEAM, where we throw arts into the equation. In fact, I’d be willing to bet that most parents who are advocating for a strong STEM education for their kids would diss an art path if that was suggested. And that could be a mistake.

As we pilot our career match making app, I recently came across some fascinating, counterintuitive data. After testing students at a top STEM middle school, we found that they actually scored higher in their artistic component than students in any of the other traditional schools that participated.

The starving artist implication that comes with the suggestion that perhaps your son should go to art school, isn’t always the easiest pill to swallow for parents. I know; I ran marketing at a large art and design university and consult for a smaller design college.

But why not? Why the disconnect? As I help kids consider various career paths, they realize that their love of art can easily dovetail with the tech jobs they’re “expected” to get. Many designers and art majors go on to some really cool jobs at little old companies like Apple, Amazon and Facebook. And they probably end up being a lot happier and more fulfilled helping design a sleek new device or campaign than stress testing a metal alloy – if that’s their thing. Virtual reality. Gaming. All these tech industries have a major art and design component that can be overlooked by parents in their quest to produce an engineer.

Parents Fear Passion

Well, parents fear lots of types of passion in their kids, but what I’m talking about is the career passion that makes kids want to pursue paths that on the surface might look nutty. Being a drummer in a rock band or a professional skateboarder don’t strike many parents as smart options, but Phil Collins did more than OK for himself.

Passion isn’t a bad thing. If you love what you’re doing, chances are good you’re going to make it work. I didn’t have a passion for working inside big companies, but I am relentless in the pursuit for growing the ones I’ve started. But no one showed me that was a possibility.

Knowing What You Want To Do Saves Angst – and Money

I find that many parents need a good old-fashioned business case for choosing an alternate path. Sure, they think that getting a college degree is the price of admission to life – and for many careers it definitely is.

“all of us are going to end up where we’re going to end up”

But going to college to “figure it out” is a much more expensive proposition these days than it used to be. And the hard truth is that some kids might be better off taking a different path with a non-traditional school, such as an art school, a vocational school or no school at all. Why not help them figure out who they are and help them find out what path they should be on, before just pushing them down the path of “least resistance.”

The bottom line is that I believe parents need to be open-minded — to let their kids to become who they are. I firmly believe that all of us are going to end up where we’re going to end up. But I can’t help but wonder what I could have done if I’d found my sweet spot earlier. Sure, I’d probably have saved a ton on dry cleaning and commuting but I would have spent a lot less time listening to pointless buzzwords being throw about on conference calls. It’s much more than that: it’s about letting kids and young adults focus on where they’re headed, rather than just listening to parents and society.

– Jose Mallabo

 

, , , , , , ,

No Comments

Stop using your great grandfather’s vocational assessment

What do you want to be when you grow up?

As kids, we were asked that all the time, and I bet no one answered, “information security analyst,” “operations research analyst” or “web developer,” just a few of the top jobs for 2016.

Screen Shot 2016-02-18 at 1.02.20 PM

When counselors direct high school students to vocational assessments today, students might still not be able to mention those specific careers, only because they don’t know the wide variety of options out there. And that’s the problem with current high school vocational assessments: they don’t point kids in the right direction for modern career paths.

The most-used high school vocational assessment is the “Strong Interest Inventory®” assessment. At $200 a pop (or the price of a Chromebook), you have to wonder how widely used it is, and from my consumer product marketing background, that calls into question the “scientific validation” they tout.

How relevant can it be if a wide cross section of people haven’t taken it? MySpace and Facebook are both social networks, but can anyone argue that MySpace has any insights into consumer or social trends since no one uses it?Even the name sounds old-fashioned, and there’s a reason for that.

The Workforce When SII Was Born

The SII was developed in 1927 to assist military men returning from World War I looking for work. Let’s paint a little picture of what the world looked like then. First of all, there were only 119 million people, and as you might imagine, the typical worker was a white male.

No surprise, the top job was manufacturing, and Henry Ford was offering Southerners $5 a day to come to work in the emerging auto industry. (“Women and negroes” not welcome, the ads said.)

And that pay scale actually doesn’t sound bad when you consider that “super-rich Americans” were those making about $10,000 a year.

The Workforce Now

In 2016 you might say the landscape looks just a little different. First of all, we’ve got 325 million of us – and growing. Top-paying jobs all involve STEM fields; in fact, at some companies, coders are writing their own paychecks.

Henry Ford’s amazing $5 a day offer? That can barely get you a coffee. He probably wouldn’t need to recruit people from outside of area, anyway, since current migration patterns are from suburbs to urban centers, where today’s young adults are less likely to want a car. And, those “women and negroes?” Well Mary Barra is CEO of Ford’s competitor General Motors, and our president is black. (The $5 was actually split 50/50 between pay and bonus!)

Super-rich Americans are counting their money in billions rather than thousands, and three of the top five earned their wealth through technology-based companies.

The whole world is available on the smartphones we carry in our pockets, instantly updated rather than relying on the printing press and newspaper of 1927.

Ch…ch…changes

When you consider the evolution (or rather revolution) that has taken place in the workforce since the SII was introduced, it makes that assessment seem pretty quaint doesn’t it?

To be fair, the SII was updated in 2012, but four years in today’s world seems like an eternity: We were still using the iPhone 4 and Snapchat was just a ghost of an idea. The IoT, smart homes and fitness trackers were all just becoming part of our vernacular. And wrap your mind around this: Adele was blowing us away with her first album, and we were gaga for Gangnam Style. (Sorry, I know that’s in your head now.)

That’s why many career counselors and educators are wondering if there’s something more accessible and more current out there in the world of high school vocational assessments to help address today’s career path discovery and education planning.

A tool that hasn’t just evolved, but that has been created specifically to fit the needs of today’s workforce. An instrument that takes into account our growing expectation of work/life balance, telework and the gig economy. One that is not cost-prohibitive in a world where freemium is the norm.

At Vireo Labs, we believe there is a better way for all high schoolers to assess their potential. And, we look forward to keeping you updated.

– Jose Mallabo

, , , , , , ,

No Comments

Practice what you teach: The $4.8 million case for centralizing university marketing

Doing marketing and PR within higher education is among the most complicated jobs imaginable. I tell my former colleagues working in consumer or corporate positions that it’s a lot like 10,000 of your customers living together in your company’s building and their parents live around the corner.

The crisis and contingency planning in university PR alone eats up the best of us. The worst-case scenario in my former corporate PR jobs was that the stock price drops a few points. The worst-case scenario in university PR is enacting the active shooter plan and figuring out who calls the FBI, when to reach out to parents and staying behind to deal with CNN while everyone else is evacuated. I used to think the only difference was the stock options.

The recruitment marketing side of things aren’t that dire, but it’s no less daunting from a channel and content perspective. Your target audience is a teenager living a busy high school life while planning an adult life and career. Their influencers are parents, friends, guidance counselors and aspirational people (real and fictional) in the world at large – experienced through countless media platforms. Factor in the 12 to 18 month sales cycle during the prospect’s most formative years and you have a job wrapped in a riddle.

Thirty years ago when I was 16, universities had to coordinate two primary media: print and broadcast. Within those there was owned (school collateral sent snail mail), earned (media placements) and probably TV advertising. (If you were lucky your school had a Division 1 team and got on national TV once in a while.)

Today, the recruitment marketing funnel looks like this with the many touch points and channels across the top.

Screen Shot 2015-12-04 at 2.02.13 PM

Assuming you can master each of these channels, getting your content to look and feel the same in a print catalog, your web site, paid promotion on Facebook, search on Google, email marketing and signage during an event is no small feat. Success is a function of organizational design and having a centralized department directing all of these channels and the content that flows through them.

The fly in the ointment for many universities is mobile – the most important medium of this generation of high school students. According to Chegg 81% of todays teens have visited a college web site for admissions information using a mobile device. Unfortunately, according to Noel Levitz, only about half of colleges have a responsive web site.

Imagine if only half of all college admissions buildings had a door.

Clearly, there are huge gaps and inefficiencies in this marketing model and it shines some light on why 4-year private colleges spend a median of $2,433 to recruit a single student – that’s $4.8 million for a freshman class of 2,000 students. This fall, 18.1 million new undergraduate students arrived on campuses in the United States.

Do the math.

Integrating all of these channels with an emphasis on mobile can drive these costs down, streamline processes and avoid the dreaded 15th email to the same prospect from three different departments at the same university. But getting your story coordinated internally is just part of it. Mapping it to the new careers-first logic being applied to college research is the last and most important mile.

Screen Shot 2015-12-04 at 2.10.55 PM

@wiltanger Tweets about her daughter’s college research approach.

Not too long ago we went to college to figure it all out. You marketed a school as a place to be because it was enough to get there to find yourself and come out as a “college man.” Now, students go through college. It is a means to a vocational end for the affluent, middle class and lower class. The wealthy want to stay that way and the rest of us want a bigger piece of the action so the search begins with a career path and ends with the educational solution that gets them there.

Leaning into this vocational positioning for most universities is hugely problematic. It goes against generations of selling the self-realization destination and social status that comes with college. And, more practically, staying on the high ground above the University of Phoenix. The good news is all of these new channels for reaching prospective students (mobile, search marketing, social media) are perfect platforms to engage in the discussion about career outcomes. It just takes planning and execution against a single strategy.

Channel coordination and consistent positioning is something every business and organization faces as it grows. Universities should know this better than anyone. Because many of their schools actually teach those lessons of integrated marketing communications within their degree programs every day.

No university in the world grants degrees in silo-based marketing, but plenty of them practice it.

– Jose Mallabo

, , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Updated: 7 (not 6) lessons higher education has taught me about marketing for Millenials

There’s been more research done to study Millenials than any other generation of American consumers. I’ve read my share of the studies, but the greatest lessons I’ve learned have been on the job at the Savannah College of Art and Design (SCAD) as senior vice president of marketing and PR.

Here are my top 6 lessons (so far):

1.  Be nimble.  Before I made the move to higher education I co-founded a fashion and lifestyle startup built on the Twitter platform targeting early adopter Millenials. As we were releasing our second product the core of our targeted consumer was still very much in love with Facebook and flat out dissed Twitter. Four or five months later, after I had taken over marketing at SCAD, that all changed very dramatically. Teenagers and young adults started leaving the suddenly parent heavy Facebook for the easier and more mobile friendly Twitter world. These platform shifts will continue to happen so pay attention and organize your teams to be able to react to major media consumption shifts like this.

Screen Shot 2015-01-11 at 6.24.49 PM

2.  Have a point of view.  Perhaps this is part of my personal opinion mixed in with the lessons this job has taught me but as the research has suggested Millenials have a more global view of social, political and financial issues than generations that preceded them as teenagers and young adults. More than anything they have a point of view about issues small and large that my generation simply didn’t start thinking about until much later in life. Trying to get your brand’s point of view in agreement with that of this generation would be a mistake. However, appearing to be neutral is a bigger mistake. It shows your company has no conviction and hints that perhaps your organization hasn’t bothered to give it any thought — which makes you neutral. In this very noisy, always on world neutral is invisible.

3.  Account for family influencers.  Remember that these are young adults who still rely on parents and other family members to make big decisions. This is especially true for making decisions about big-ticket items like college. The consideration to go to college runs very broadly into familial networks (i.e. legacy, heritage and location) but very specifically to mom. The lesson for college and non-college marketers alike is that when targeting Millenials you must address the conversation they will be having with parents and others in the family. Build a relationship with that influencer through the medium or channel of their choice – which will not be the same channel. See my note about Twitter and Facebook above.

4.  Test your message.  Millenials are nothing if not professional multi-taskers especially when it comes to media consumption. Gaming. Social media. Music. YouTube. Text messages. Chats. Email. All are used on multiple devices at a pace that makes us old farts rather dizzy. If your message is not on target immediately it is ignored. Unlike my generation (who disdained advertising and marketing as a rule) Millenials actually like to interact with great marketing but your message and content has to be framed within a worldview they already have. This is true for every consumer, but more so for the generation who has grown up with the unsubscribe button at their fingertips right out of the womb.

5.  Email is not dead.  Coming into my position at SCAD, I thought that email was irrelevant to our targeted consumer compared to search engine marketing, social media and PR. I was as wrong as acid wash jeans outside of a truck stop. Email can play a critical role in your communications strategy and media mix, but it has to be integrated with other content on social and the web. In my opinion, email to Millenials is something you introduce well after they’ve started to engage with your brand. It cannot stand on its own and less is definitely more. For people over 40 spam is annoying but tolerated. To Millenials SPAM is the devil burning Styrofoam cups on their iPhone. A few months ago, my team launched an email campaign (tied to other content) to an already used list of teenagers and we increased click through rates 383% and click to open rates by 502% from one campaign to the next — using the same list. We were very selective about the messaging, creative and time of delivery. It can be done. (See the before and after.)

6.  Print publications are (almost) dead.  I am writing this in a hip coffee shop where I am easily the oldest customer; and I just did a lap around the room. Not a single Millenial has the print edition of the Wall Street Journal or New York Times (or any print publication for that matter) open. As a 46-year-old who started my career in a New York PR agency, I love the feel of the New York Times in my hands. It makes me feel like a better person just clutching it let alone acting like I’m reading it in public. But I’m not my target audience, they are. So when it comes to launching an integrated PR/marketing campaign for Millenials save that earned print media push for their parents.

7.  Understand a 15 year old’s motivations.  Sophomores and juniors aspire to a lifestyle supported by a career and the money that comes with it. Your college is a way to get there, not a destination. Remember that when you’re drafting an email or copy for your web site — they don’t care about what it’s like to get there, they want to know what you can do to help them achieve their career goals. And despite the outcry and media headlines, money is no object. Families are more than willing to foot the bill to get their posterity on a career path.

Other stuff to read.  Other than this brilliant post, if you’re going to do some reading about marketing for Millenials pick up “Chasing Youth Culture and Getting it Right” by Tina Wells. It is far more than a primer on the subject but really expounds on the many issues identified above and in more white paper like research about this generation of consumers. I pick it up and re-read chapters just as I do with “The Tipping Point” or “Positioning” before I build a campaign.

– Jose Mallabo

, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

1 Comment

Email is not dead in Millenials marketing

After posting 6 Lessons higher education has taught me about marketing for Millenials, I’ve gotten more head scratching about advocating for email in the overall media mix for this group. There’s no doubt emailing high school students isn’t the same as sending email to working professionals way back in 2001 — when answering emails on a BlackBerry in public was a personal branding opportunity to announce: “I’m so important, I’m answering email right here, right now!” 🙂

My point was simply to not ignore it and to think through where in the overall mix between social, PR, content marketing email fits when trying to engage Millenials in your higher education (or otherwise) brand. We actually used email at various stages of the marketing funnel at the Savannah College of Art & Design during my tenure. Campaigns at the top of the funnel were by far the most demanding simply because the awareness level was generally fairly low. Remember, this is the generation raised on social and mobile. Understanding that young adults actually like visual marketing, we took a more mobile product launch mindset to help us break away from the approach that these were somehow personal notes between strangers who haven’t yet met.

Below is the before and after — resulting in an increase of 383% click through rates and an increase of 502% click to open rates to the same list of high school students.  In short, more people opened and clicked through to the new email campaign (which was the fourth one these students received from us) than on the first campaign when performance rates are almost always higher.  It can be done.

Before. Lots of text, hyperlinks instead of buttons:

Screen Shot 2015-04-19 at 1.12.39 PM

After. And, better. Stronger positioning, buttons for easy mobile click throughs:

Screen Shot 2015-04-19 at 1.12.59 PM

– Jose Mallabo 

, ,

1 Comment